|
|
|
|
|

|
WHITE HOUSE REPORTS SUCCESS |
|
October 30, 2009
Back in January,
Obama and Biden promised that the billions in stimulus money would create at least 600,000 jobs. During the 2008 election campaign
the propagated number was 3,000,000.
In Thursday's edition of the Gloucester County Times, an Associated Press
article stated, "A Colorado company said it created 4,321 jobs with the help of
President Barack Obama's economic recovery plan. The real number was fewer than 1000. A child
care center in Florida said it saved 129 jobs... instead it gave pay raises to its existing
employees." The article goes on to list other cases including jobs counted numerous times.
Later in the day, AP
reported, "The White House is promising that new figures being released Friday will be a more
accurate showing of progress in President Barack Obama's economic recovery plan. It aggressively
defended an earlier, faulty count that overstated by thousands the jobs created or saved so far."
Friday has arrived. I read today's paper and found nothing. I checked a number of big media websites
and found a report from the
UPI, "The White House announced Friday that the $787 billion U.S. economic stimulus program saved at least 650,000 state and local jobs."
There is a vast difference between creating jobs and saving them.
Fortunately, some people are still working. Most jobs that have been created
are government jobs.
I don't suppose anyone reading the report would bother to divide 650,000 into $787 billion,
but then the administration would have an explanation.
Tomorrow is Halloween followed by Reformation Sunday; first the mask and
then the truth. We were promised change and we have it! They call it "trick
or treat."
|
AMERICANS LOST MORE FREEDOM TODAY! |
|
October 28, 2009
Today was another tragic day in American history.
Many Americans died in the Revolutionary War. But they were fighting for freedom and America won.
Their blood was not shed in vain.
Many Americans died in Europe and Asia fighting for freedom from tyranny. Freedom won, so they
died for a great cause.
Some of America's most tragic losses were suffered when Americans were not
at war and no blood was shed. The perpetrators were fellow Americans elected
by a majority of the citizens.
One of the most devastating attacks against our freedom took
place in 1963 when the government banned God from public places. The
Constitution of the United States forbids government established or
sponsored religion, but guarantees citizens the right to practice their
faith.
The 1963 Supreme Court decision determined that religion
should have no place on government property, schools in particular. In effect,
the court made atheism the official religion of America.
Consequently, Obama recently stated that, "we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation," and he
boycotted the annual Presidential Prayer Breakfast. The White House has now informed those who
create special ornaments for the White House trees, that they would not be called "Christmas trees"
this year. They will be called "Holiday trees," and no ornaments may be used that have a religious theme.
In 1973, abortion was legalized. Although the battle Roe vs. Wade was fought without bloodshed,
that decision has resulted in more deaths than the Revolutionary War, Civil War and both World Wars combined.
Doctors may now kill all the babies they want without fearing legal action.
Today, October 28, 2009, Obama ignored the Constitution (again) and outlawed free speech for some Americans
while giving special protection and privileges to another segment of society. The so-called "Hate Crime"
law was smuggled into a military defense bill.
Christians can no longer publicly state their beliefs based on what the Bible says about proper human behavior
or share their convictions about religious systems that stand in conflict with the teachings of Christianity.
Abortion doctors not only have legal protection for their trade, they don't
even have to hear the protests of concerned Christians. King Herod became
infamous for his "slaughter of the infants" but murdering unborn babies is
now a respectable occupation and protesting is a "hate crime."
It is both interesting and saddening to note an unmistakable parallel in these
decisions. They are all aimed at practicing Christians and no one else. If
these rulings were aimed at any other social, ethnic or religious group, it
would be considered a violation of their constitutional rights.
It has always been a crime to do bodily harm to another person regardless of
motivation. But now it is also a crime to speak out on matters we believe to
be wrong or immoral. If someone claims that reading my blog motivated them to
commit a crime, I could be jailed. Washington politicians, the media and many
others accuse "the religious right" of all kinds of evil. If someone
burned a church or assassinated a pastor after hearing such rhetoric, they
might be taken to court, but can anyone perceive of a politician or reporter
being prosecuted for committing a hate crime?
|
IMPORTANT DAYS COMING |
|
October 21, 2009
Microsoft officially releases Windows 7 tomorrow. I recently bought a new
computer because the old one was hopelessly overloaded with useless updates
from Microsoft and McAfey. I received a certificate with the PC that entitles
me to Windows 7. I am not sure that I want it even though I am very unhappy
with Vista. I have no reason to believe that a company which has gotten
progressively worse over the years is suddenly offering something better.
Someone I know who has the highest certification Microsoft offers needed
48 hours to get Windows 7 running properly. I just spent more time than that
trying to get Vista running properly and am still frustrated with it. I can wait!
Another big day is coming up in two weeks. Many disgruntled Republicans in
New Jersey say they are not voting. New Jersey is one of two states voting
for a Governor, but many Republicans can't get excited about Christy
and won't vote for Corzine.
I am an American and I believe every American should vote. I too am
disappointed with the Republican Party. I received a call last week from
some party representative and told him that I was writing Steve Lonegan's name
in on the ballot. I said, "If enough of us do that, the party may get
the message. Lonegan was the only Republican contender for the Governor's seat
in the primary who represented traditional Republican values, but the party
chose Christy and nearly all its propaganda was directed against a fellow
Republican, Steve Lonegan."
This is probably the last time I vote either Republican or Democrat barring
some kind of miracle. I plan to do all in my power to encourage the
establishment of a national TEA Party. TEA stands for Taxpayer Electoral Alliance.
If you were not planning to vote, I encourage you to join me in writing in
Steve Lonegan for Governor. Sending a message with your vote is much more
American than staying home and doing nothing.
|
SUPREME COURT DECISION ON DOGS |
|
October 6, 2009
While high ranking politicians in the White House and Pentagon discuss the
bloody war in Afghanistan, the Supreme Court is deliberating what to do
about bloody dog fight videos.
Readers of my blog know that my wife and I love dogs. We just finished
raising a dog for The Seeing Eye. Venita has passed her physical and is
presently in training to guide a blind person.
I hate some insects and try to kill them at every opportunity but even
mosquitoes should not have to suffer long. I try to make death quick and
unexpected. It's the way I want to go.
I enjoy watching fish, chicken, cows and other animals, but I
like them best when they are cooked, fried or grilled. I have eaten horse
meat, but can't say that I enjoyed it much. I understand the Chinese eat dog
meat but I would have to be starving to join them!
During World Wars I and II, dog fights were popular and the men who got
involved often received medals of valor. Only people and no dogs died in
those fights, so the animal rights groups didn't protest.
Apparently there is a lot of money to be made with dog
fights. Even people who earn millions in other occupations can hardly resist
the temptation to get involved in dog fighting. Some have discovered that
there is money to be made selling video tapes of dog fights. That is why the Supreme
Court is getting involved. Not in dog fights but deciding if the sale of dog
fight videos should be legal.
The unusual thing about this Supreme Court case is the fact that there are
liberals arguing on both sides of the aisle. Liberals who display great
unity when fighting conservatives are now at odds over this delicate issue.
Liberal groups such as the ACLU
believe in unlimited free speech for everyone except conservatives and the
religious right. Freedom of speech includes vulgar language much worse than
the words I learned from kids in First Grade. My mother made me take a bite
of soap for exercising my free speech rights back then.
Liberals have expanded free speech rights to include freedom of expression. Going
naked in public and selling dog fight videos are expressions that should not
be suppressed in America.
The animal rights people are opposed to hurting
anything that lives except for human babies (they call them embryos or
fetuses).
This court case could turn out to be more violent than a dog fight, but it
will likely end in a compromise. If selling violent videos should be forbidden
the entire television and video game industries would be in jeopardy!
   
|
|
|